A Snapshot In Time: What More Christians Should Consider

By | May 10, 2012

My parents took hundreds of pictures of my brother and me when we were children. They were acutely aware that our childhood quirks were literally there one day and gone the next, and they responded to our scarily rapid evolution by trying to capture every moment with a still photograph. It seemed that  every breath was followed by a blinding flash of light. Every milestone was recorded on film. My parents knew that pictures would be much easier to preserve than their memories.

I peruse those old photos and like a time traveler, relive the beauty of my own human journey… laughter… tears… deceased relatives whose names I don’t remember, but whose kisses on my tiny cheek were preserved forever on Polaroid paper… bad haircuts and good friends… First steps and last occasions… All neatly and chronologically immortalized in volumes of dusty picture albums.

The Bible offers something very similar.

Through the words of ancient men and women, we’re given the distinct privilege of unpacking a time capsule full of photographs. When we read a Bible passage (or any other ancient text), we’re peering into one moment in time. Like a catalog of faded polaroid pictures, the Bible allows us to hold a series of expired moments in our hands… one split second… and then two seconds… and three seconds of an age gone by… Yes, gone forever… but forever tangible.

When I look at my own baby pictures, and my school photos, and my graduation photos, and the photos of my early adult life, I am deeply grateful to have such beautifully-preserved records of my life-journey. However, the fullness of my story is not present in any one of those old photographs– or even in any of the newer ones. The fullness of my God-given purpose cannot be surmised by looking at one– or even one hundred– of my life’s photographs.

Likewise, the fullness of what it means for us to be human, or spiritual, or in love, or alive cannot be gleaned by looking at any one or two, or five, or one hundred of the Bible’s many pictures.

The Bible offers photographs of war and peace, love and hatred, acceptance and bigotry. Those photos show us times and places, people and things, ideas and ideologies. But like our own personal picture albums, the Bible–Christianity’s picture album– is not an eternal commentary. It is one volume of the faith’s long history.

Despite this, we look at the Bible’s photographs and attempt to expand the images beyond their context. We attempt to apply the imagery generated by a culture thousands of years older than our own to our society. We infer from one photo in which one man told another, “a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh” that every marriage will carry these narrow characteristics for the rest of eternity. (…We infer a two-person heterosexual marriage from these words, even though the marriages of which Jesus spoke didn’t actually match our cultural pattern. We’re talking about men who married twelve-year-old girls, and often entered polygamous relationships. How’s that for promoting “biblical marriages” as described in Matthew 19:3-7?… But I digress.)

What would happen if we did this with all of our photographs? What would happen if someone found a picture taken of you before you became who you are today… before you were older and wiser… before you knew what you know now… and decided that the old you was the only you that could ever be considered legitimate?

How does our perspective change when we realize that we’re only living in a snapshot of humankind’s history? That we don’t know everything that will be known about scripture or Jesus? That the next generation will know more about being fully human than we know today?

How would our use of the Bible change if we understood it as a time capsule filled with pictures?

8 thoughts on “A Snapshot In Time: What More Christians Should Consider

  1. Deanna Ogle (@deannaogle)

    You know, I guess I hadn’t thought about it that way. If we tried to enforce the principles and ideals from the Middle Ages into modern America, that would be kind of ridiculous. Why? Because society is different now. It’s moved on.

    So how do we then progress? We can’t toss out the whole thing, but maybe we need to start REALLY focusing on the spirit of the message and story? The morals and the love instead of the “let’s stone virgins who get married”?

    Excellent post, Crystal, as usual!

    1. Crystal St. Marie Lewis Post author

      I couldn’t agree more, Deanna… I continue to ask myself how we progress without losing the core of our identity. I am beginning to also believe that the power is in incorporating more metaphor into our understandings of what the scriptures mean– “the spirit” rather than “the letter”… I am not sure that others will ever really buy into this, especially now that the faith is so attached to using the Bible as a literalistic instruction manual. One can only hope that we’ll experience a widespread change in perspective that will cause us to change the way we use scripture.

      1. Patrick (@SpringaldJack)

        Well that’s the thing. Christianity doesn’t follow the Bible as a literalistic instruction manual. Even (especially?) those parts of the tradition that claim to do so. We can look at how historically those interpretations were constructed, and it’s not by just taking words at face value. Among “literalists” after all ideas like the rapture that come from the incoherent interpretations of figures whose own particular horizons did not respect the structure of the text at all engaging in extreme forms of “cherry-picking.” The claim to liteal adherence is a rhetorical move that’s designed to stop alternative interpretations.

  2. Pingback: A Few Words on Top-Down Theology « Crystal St. Marie Lewis

  3. Pingback: Was This Guy Really Resurrected? « Crystal St. Marie Lewis

  4. Pingback: God In the Gray Areas: A Defense of the ‘Spiritual But Not Religious’ « Crystal St. Marie Lewis

  5. Pingback: Kingdoms, Afterlives and Political Shenanigans « Crystal St. Marie Lewis

  6. Pingback: Is Humanism a Religion? (And more thoughts on religious privilege) | Crystal St. Marie Lewis

Comments are closed.